Integration of morphometric, meristic analysis and DNA barcoding in benthodemersal species of Peruvian waters. Autumn 2014 (Part I)

Authors

  • Fabiola Zavalaga Talledo Instituto del Mar del Perú
  • Giovanna Sotil Caycho Instituto del Mar del Perú
  • Ruslan Pastor Cuba Instituto del Mar del Perú

Keywords:

Morphometric, meristic, barcode, DNA, benthodemersal analysis, Peru

Abstract

In autumn of 2014, during the evaluation cruise of the hake and other demersal population on board the BIC Humboldt, 9 families and 12 species were recorded: Cephalurus cephalus (Gilbert, 1892) “tadpole shark”; Coelorinchus canus (Garman, 1899) “mouse fish”; Physiculus nematopus Gilbert, 1890 “coal of mud”; Merluccius gayi (Guichenot, 1848) “hake”; Cherublemma emmelas (Gilbert, 1890) “black conger”; Pontinus sierra (Gilbert, 1890) “diabolical fish”; Prionotus stephanophrys Lockington, 1881 “false flyer”; Citharichthys platophrys Gilbert, 1891 “plate sole”; Hippoglossina macrops Steindachner, 1876 “bigeye flounder”; Hippoglossina tetrophthalma (Gilbert, 1890) “Fourspot flounder”; Engyophrys sanctilaurentii Jordan and Bollman, 1890 “Speckled-tail flounder” and Monolene maculipinna Garman, 1899 “Pacific deepwater flounder”. The morphometric, meristic and molecular analyzes were performed, the latter being used to generate their respective DNA barcodes. The specimens identified morphologically as H. macrops, C. cephalus, C. emmelas, C. canus and P. sierra could not be corroborated molecularly due to the lack of records in the nucleotide databases. The DNA sequences obtained were incorporated into the BOLD database, being the first records for these species. No differences were found between the samples of M. gayi from Peru with respect to M. gayi reported in Ecuador, nor M. gayi gayi from Chile, so it is important to perform new analyzes based on other markers. On the other hand, some specimens previously identified as Physiculus talarae also showed characteristics of P. rastrelliger and P. nematopus, according to the morphological analysis carried out in the laboratory. The molecular analysis determined that these specimens correspond to P. nematopus. This shows that the analysis of morphological and molecular characters constitutes complementary tools in the investigations, contributing in the validation of the identification, distribution and propagation of the species in the benthodemersal subsystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Álamo V, Valdivieso V. 1997. Lista Sistemática de Moluscos Marinos del Perú. Rev. Instituto del Mar del Perú (IMARPE). 2da Edición. Callao-Perú. Vol. Extraordinario. 205 p.

Convention on Biological Diversity (CDB). 1992. 5 June 1992, Río de Janeiro. Brasil.

Chapin F S, Zavaleta E S, Eviner V T, Naylor R L, Vitousek P M, Reynolds H L, Hooper D U, Lavorel S, Sala O E, Hobbie S E, Mock M C, Díaz S. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234-242.

Chirichigno N,Vélez J. 1998. Clave para identificar los peces marinos del Perú. 2da edición. Instituto del Mar del Perú. Publicación especial. Callao. Perú. 500 pp.

Fischer W, Krupp F, Schneider W, Sommer C, Carpenter K E, Niem V H. 1995. Guía FAO para Identificación de Especies para los Fines de la Pesca. Pacífico Centro-Oriental. Volumen II y III. Vertebrados. Roma. FAO.

Halpern B S, Longo C, Hardy D, McLeod K L, Samhouri J F, Katona S K, Kleisner K, Lester S E, O’Leary J, Ranelletti M, Rosenberg A A, Scarborough C, Selig E R, Best B D, Brumbaugh D R, Chapin F S, Crowder L B, Daly K L, Doney S C, Elfes C, Fogarty M J, Gaines S D, Jacobsen K I, Karrer L B, Leslie H M, Neeley E, Pauly D, Polasky S, Ris B, StMartin K, Stone G S, Sumaila U R, Zeller D. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature. 488(7413): 615.

Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S L, DeWaard J R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

Ivanova N V, Zemlak T S, Hanner R H, Hebert P D N. 2007. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 544-548.

Kumar S, Parthiban T, Rao G. 2008. Molecular characterization of Jatropha genetic resources through inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Mol Biol Rep. 36: 1951 – 1956.

Larkin M A, Blackshields G, Brown N P, Chenna R, McGettigan P A, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace I M, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Higgins D G. 2007. ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 23(21): 2947-2948.

Messing J. 1983. New M13 vectors for cloning. Methods in Enzymology. 101, 20-78.

Nedeléc C,Prado J. 1999. Definition and classification of fishing gear categories. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 222. Rome, FAO. 109 p.

Okonski S L, Martini L W. 1987. Artes y Métodos de pesca. Materiales didácticos para la capacitación técnica, Hemisferio Sur. (Buenos Aires). 339 p.

Prado J, Dremiere P Y. 1988. Guide pratique du marin pécheur [Fisherman’s workbook]. FAO, Rome (Italy). Div. des Industries de la Peche, 189 p.

Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S.2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular biology and evolution 30 (12): 2725-2729.

Trivedi S et al. 2015. Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: An update. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.

Zhang J B, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 39: 31-42.

Published

2017-12-29

How to Cite

Zavalaga Talledo, F., Sotil Caycho, G., & Pastor Cuba, R. (2017). Integration of morphometric, meristic analysis and DNA barcoding in benthodemersal species of Peruvian waters. Autumn 2014 (Part I). Boletin Instituto Del Mar Del Perú, 32(2), 214–259. Retrieved from https://revistas.imarpe.gob.pe/index.php/boletin/article/view/62